AOS2-Creating+&+Presenting+++Context-Family+&+Society

=**INTRODUCTORY ACTIVITIES**= toc =**__STATEMENT OF EXPLANATION__**= (FLAP & C) =CREATIVE SAC=
 * Form
 * Language
 * Audience
 * Purpose
 * Context

=EXPOSITORY SAC= Useful resources and websites

ARTICLES [|Article- Social Media is not Community] [|Ten ways social media has changed parenting] [|Social media supports community resillience during natural disaster] [|Using social media during natural disasters is comforting, study finds] [|Just shut your facebook, pal]

WEBSITES [|Raising children network-teens and social media] [|Pros and cons of social networking] [|The impact of social media on children, adolescents and families]



Outcome 2 Draw on ideas and/or arguments suggested by a chosen Context to create written texts for a specified audience and purpose; and to discuss and analyse in writing their decisions about form, purpose, language, audience and context. ||
 * ===SAC ASSESSMENT -Context:Family and Society===
 * MARK RANGE || DESCRIPTOR: typical performance in each range ||
 * 25–30 marks || Skilful shaping of ideas, arguments and language appropriate to the chosen form, audience, purpose and context. Sophisticated understanding of complex ideas and/or arguments relevant to the chosen Context and presented in selected text/s; a demonstrated ability to draw on and develop these in the creation of own text/s. Highly expressive, fluent and coherent writing. Use of appropriate metalanguage to present an insightful, highly expressive and coherent written explanation of personal authorial choices. ||
 * 19–24 marks || Considered use of ideas, arguments and language appropriate to the chosen form, audience, purpose and context. Thorough understanding of ideas and/or arguments relevant to the chosen Context and presented in selected text/s; a demonstrated ability to draw purposefully on these in the creation of own text/s. Expressive, fluent and coherent writing. Use of appropriate metalanguage to present a considered, expressive and coherent written explanation of personal authorial choices. ||
 * 13–18 marks || Suitable use of ideas, arguments and language appropriate to the chosen form, audience, purpose and context. Clear understanding of basic ideas and/or arguments relevant to the chosen Context and presented in selected texts; a demonstrated ability to draw on these to some degree in the creation of own text/s. Generally expressive, fluent and coherent writing. Use of metalanguage to present a clear, coherent and general explanation of personal authorial choices. ||
 * 7–12 marks || Use of ideas, arguments and language generally appropriate to the chosen form, audience, purpose and context. Some understanding of basic ideas and/or arguments relevant to the chosen Context and presented in selected texts; some evidence of an ability to draw on these in the creation of own text/s. Clear expression of ideas in writing. Use of limited metalanguage to present a general explanation of personal authorial choices. ||
 * 1–6 marks || Little evidence of an ability to use ideas, arguments and language appropriate to the chosen form, audience, purpose and context. Limited understanding of basic ideas and/or arguments relevant to the chosen Context and presented in selected texts; little evidence of an ability to draw on these in the creation of own text/s. Simple expression of ideas in writing. Little use of metalanguage and minimal discussion of authorial choices. ||